History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starkweather v. Eddy
1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
Cal. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment

The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *Page 122 the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.

[1] Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview ofGeneral Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal.App. 17 [217 P. 1086], said motion should be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Fricke, J., pro tem., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Starkweather v. Eddy
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 22, 1932
Citation: 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
Docket Number: Docket No. 8215.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.