History
  • No items yet
midpage
Starkweather v. Eddy
1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

The plaintiff and respondent moved to dismiss the appeal in the instant case upon the ground that *Page 122 the same was not pursued in this court within the time prescribed by law.

[1] Nothing more than the filing and serving of a notice of appeal appears to have been accomplished prior to expiration of the time for ordering a transcript. The motion to dismiss is not resisted, and since it falls squarely within the purview ofGeneral Motors Acceptance Corp. v. Holman, 63 Cal.App. 17 [217 P. 1086], said motion should be granted.

The appeal is dismissed.

Works, P.J., and Fricke, J., pro tem., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Starkweather v. Eddy
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jan 22, 1932
Citation: 1932 Cal. App. LEXIS 90
Docket Number: Docket No. 8215.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.