History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calif. Highway Commr. v. Indus. Accident Commr.
1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 584
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1923
|
Check Treatment

This matter comes to us upon a writ of review and we are asked to annul an award of the Industrial Accident Commission made to respondent H. H. Newberry because of injuries sustained by him and which said commission has found were sustained "in the course of and arising out of his employment."

Applicant was injured in the accident out of which arose the case of California Highway Com. v. Industrial Acc. Com., ante, p. 284 [214 P. 658]. It was stipulated that the law and the facts in that case and in this one were identical. It is unnecessary, therefore, to set out the facts herein, as they are discussed in the opinion filed in the parallel case. [1] Upon the authority of that decision, and for the reasons stated therein, the award of the Industrial Accident Commission made herein is annulled.

Nourse, J., and Sturtevant, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Calif. Highway Commr. v. Indus. Accident Commr.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Mar 7, 1923
Citation: 1923 Cal. App. LEXIS 584
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4431.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.