History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Ross
1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 206
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1911
|
Check Treatment

The writ must be denied for various reasons. First, the evidence had upon the preliminary examination is not authenticated in any manner. Second, while the aggressive acts of defendant were directed toward a third party, they were done in the presence of the officer and so terrorized him that he was prevented from discharging a duty and the effect of which was to resist such officer. As to the other offense of assault with a deadly weapon, it may be, if the case of People v.Sylva, 143 Cal. 62, [78 P. 814], is to be followed as a correct exposition of the law, that upon a final trial it might be held insufficient to warrant a conviction of the exact offense charged, although not of lesser offenses embraced therein. But upon a preliminary hearing, we regard the unauthenticated evidence presented as insufficient, even if authenticated, to warrant the writ.

Assuming that reasonable grounds are shown to warrant the magistrate in binding the petitioner over, the bail is not excessive.

Writ denied. *Page 677

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Ross
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 18, 1911
Citation: 1911 Cal. App. LEXIS 206
Docket Number: Crim. No. 231.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.