History
  • No items yet
midpage
Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.
111 Cal. App. 564
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding damages in a condemnation suit brought for the condemnation of a street for a public road. Almost all or both of appellant's briefs consist of comparison or weighing of the evidence of values given, as to the values of the lands to be taken, and the damage to the defendants, by reason of severance.

[1] The only assignments of error made in appellant's opening brief are: First, that the evidence dos not sustain *Page 565 the verdict, and second, that the compensation awarded respondent is excessive.

If there is any evidence to sustain the awards we cannot weigh the evidence. There is in the record sufficient evidence to sustain the awards of the jury in this case.

The judgment is affirmed.

Conrey, P.J., and Houser, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Santa Barbara Co. v. Hollister E. Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 4, 1931
Citation: 111 Cal. App. 564
Docket Number: Docket No. 7232.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.