History
  • No items yet
midpage
People v. Safasr
1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 130
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was convicted of the crime of receiving stolen property and appeals from the judgment and from the order denying his motion for a new trial.

[1] No brief has been filed in behalf of appellant and his counsel failed to appear at the time set for oral argument. An examination of the record on appeal discloses no error.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hart, J., and Burnett, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: People v. Safasr
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Jun 5, 1922
Citation: 1922 Cal. App. LEXIS 130
Docket Number: Crim. No. 628.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.