History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller Lux Inc. v. Starkey
15 P.2d 185
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

[1] It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College,103 Cal.App. 139 [283 P. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

*Page 80

Case Details

Case Name: Miller Lux Inc. v. Starkey
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 17, 1932
Citation: 15 P.2d 185
Docket Number: Docket No. 1034.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.