History
  • No items yet
midpage
Miller Lux Inc. v. Starkey
15 P.2d 185
Cal. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment

The respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal herein on the ground that no transcript has been filed within the time allowed.

[1] It appears, by certificate of the county clerk, that notice of appeal was filed on June 2, 1932, that no proceedings have been begun for the preparation or settlement of either a transcript or a bill of exceptions, that no such proceedings are pending, and that the time therefor has expired. The motion should be granted. (People v. Berkeley Chiropractic College,103 Cal.App. 139 [283 P. 981].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Marks, J., and Jennings, J., concurred.

*Page 80

Case Details

Case Name: Miller Lux Inc. v. Starkey
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 17, 1932
Citation: 15 P.2d 185
Docket Number: Docket No. 1034.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.