History
  • No items yet
midpage
Andrews v. Barrett
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 394
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than the action entitledAndrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed. [1] While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in each case could be used in the other; that the reporters' transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.

On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Andrews v. Barrett
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Sep 24, 1929
Citation: 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 394
Docket Number: Docket No. 6624.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.