History
  • No items yet
midpage
Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Haynes
162 P. 1181
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1916
|
Check Treatment

In this action plaintiff seeks to enforce a liability of defendant and appellant Dora L. Haynes and others as stockholders of the Manhattan Securities Company, an Arizona corporation, for an indebtedness of that corporation. Judgment having been rendered against the respective defendants in several amounts, some of the defendants appealed to the supreme court. The judgment against Dora L. Haynes being for less than two thousand dollars, her appeal is to this court. The appeals in each instance are from the judgment and from orders denying motions of the defendants for a new trial. The appeals of the other defendants to the supreme court involved the same questions upon which the appeals of Dora L. Haynes depend. Those appeals were decided by the supreme court July 11, 1916, and the judgments and orders were affirmed as to them. (Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Haynes, 173 Cal. 44, [159 P. 155].) Upon the authority of that decision, the judgment and order appealed from herein are affirmed.

James, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Provident Gold Mining Co. v. Haynes
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 16, 1916
Citation: 162 P. 1181
Docket Number: Civ. No. 1510.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.