History
  • No items yet
midpage
Paddon v. Superior Court
1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 591
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1924
|
Check Treatment

[1] It appearing to the court that proceedings were pending charging the petitioner, William Locke Paddon, with contempt of the orders of the trial court at the time the order herein sought to be reviewed was made; and it further appearing that the said William Locke Paddon is the real party in interest herein;

It is ordered that the petition for a writ of prohibition be denied upon the authority of Knoob v. Knoob, 192 Cal. 95 *Page 480 [218 P. 568], Soderberg v. Soderberg, 63 Cal.App. 492 [219 P. 82], and Weeks v. Superior Court, 187 Cal. 620 [203 P. 93].

All the Justices concurred.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the district court of appeal on February 21, 1924, and an application by petitioners to have the cause heard in the supreme court, after judgment in the district court of appeal, was denied by the supreme court on March 31, 1924.

All the Justices concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Paddon v. Superior Court
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 1, 1924
Citation: 1924 Cal. App. LEXIS 591
Docket Number: Civ. No. 4888.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.