History
  • No items yet
midpage
Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co.
1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 31
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

Defendants appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $3,800 in an action brought to recover said sum alleged to be due him for salary as president.

[1] Defendants contend that there was not sufficient evidence to sustain the findings, that the trial court erred in certain rulings on the admission of evidence and also that it erred in denying defendants' motion for nonsuit interposed at the conclusion of plaintiff's case.

However, there was substantial evidence to sustain the findings, there were no prejudicial errors in the rulings on the admission of evidence, and the motion for nonsuit was properly denied.

Judgment affirmed.

Houser, Acting P.J., and York, J., concurred.

Case Details

Case Name: Crites v. Aa1 Rock Salt Chemicals Co.
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Mar 20, 1929
Citation: 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 31
Docket Number: Docket No. 6210.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.