History
  • No items yet
midpage
In Re Latourell
296 P. 621
| Cal. Ct. App. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

THE COURT.

An application for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner is charged by a complaint filed in the Municipal Court of the City and County of San Francisco with a misdemeanor, to wit: vagrancy.[1] The form of the complaint is not questioned, but section 647 of the Penal Code defining vagrancy, by its terms, is not operative against a "California Indian", and it is alleged in the petition for this writ that petitioner "is an Indian of the Yakima Tribe, of Yakima, Washington". He contends, therefore, that the municipal court is without jurisdiction to try him for the offense of vagrancy. Admittedly, however, the municipal court has jurisdiction in vagrancy cases, and therefore the question of whether or not petitioner is of the race which exempts him from the operation of the vagrancy law manifestly is one of fact which must be determined upon trial of the action. It is not a proper subject of inquiry before this court in a proceeding on habeascorpus. The application is therefore denied.

Case Details

Case Name: In Re Latourell
Court Name: California Court of Appeal
Date Published: Feb 25, 1931
Citation: 296 P. 621
Docket Number: Docket No. 1622.
Court Abbreviation: Cal. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.