The Honorable Shawn Womack State Senator P.O. Box 332 Mountain Home, AR 72654
Dear Senator Womack:
I am writing in response to your request for my opinion on the following question, which you have submitted on behalf of the Boone County Quorum Court:
Are counties obligated to pay mileage for travel incurred by the Public Defender's office?
You refer me to A.C.A. §§
RESPONSE
In my opinion, the answer to this question is "no."
Section
(a) The Arkansas Public Defender Commission shall be responsible for the payment of the following:
* * *
(3) The payment of the costs of certain expenses, as authorized by §
16-87-212 .(b) Each county or counties within a judicial district shall be responsible for the payment of the following:
(1) The cost of facilities, equipment, supplies, and other office expenses necessary to the effective and efficient operation of the public defender's office; and
(2) The compensation of additional personnel within the office of the public defender, when approved in advance by the quorum court.
Section
(a)(1) The Arkansas Public Defender Commission is authorized to pay for certain expenses regarding the defense of indigents.
(2) The expenses shall include, but shall not necessarily be limited to, fees for appointed counsel, expert witnesses, temporary investigators, testing, and travel.
(3)(A) Whenever, in a case involving an indigent person; a judge orders an authorized payment, a copy of the order accompanied by a detailed explanation of services rendered, time spent, and expenses incurred shall be transmitted to the commission, and the commission shall set the amount of compensation.
(B) Orders as authorized throughout this chapter shall be paid by the commission provided sufficient funds are available.
* * *
(c) At the discretion of the commission, capital murder cases and all proceedings under the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure, Rule 37.5, shall be paid entirely by the commission.
(Emphasis added.)
In reviewing these statutes, I am struck by the fact that A.C.A. §
I believe my proposed reading of these statutes is consistent with the following statement of what the legislature intended in enacting Acts 788 and 1341 of 1997, which are codified in the statutes discussed above:
It is . . . the intent of this act to begin to phase in the responsibility of the funding of a part of the state trial court system from county government to the state. It is, further, the intent of this act to continue and improve the reporting of information from cities and counties concerning the costs of providing the court system and the revenues produced from court costs, fees, and fines.
A.C.A. §
Assistant Attorney General Jack Druff prepared the foregoing, which I hereby approve.
Sincerely,
MIKE BEEBE Attorney General
MB:JD/cyh
