Faith Fields, MSN, RN Executive Director Arkansas State Board of Nursing 1123 South University, Suite 800 Little Rock, AR 72204
Charles Campbell, Pharm.D. Executive Director Arkansas State Board of Pharmacy 101 East Capitol, Suite 218 Little Rock, AR 72201
Dear Ms. Fields and Dr. Campbell:
You have requested an official Attorney General's opinion regarding the authority of advanced practice nurses. Your question is:
Do advanced practice nurses with prescriptive authority have the implied authority pursuant to applicable law to give sample prescription drugs to patients?
Response
Although Arkansas law does not expressly address the issue you have raised, it is my opinion that advanced practice nurses with prescriptive authority do have the implied authority to give sample prescription drugs to patients.
As you noted in your correspondence, nurses who have attained the level of nursing practice known as "advanced practice nursing," pursuant to A.C.A. §
The foregoing statutory and regulatory provisions and holdings lead me to conclude that under Arkansas law, advanced practice nurses have implied authority to give prescription drug samples to patients. I base this conclusion on two rules of statutory interpretation.
First, the Arkansas Supreme Court has consistently held that statutes should not be interpreted in a manner that would lead to an absurd result or that would render the statute meaningless. See, e.g., AtT v. PublicServ.,
Second, the Arkansas Supreme Court has held that an agency's interpretation of a statute that it is charged with administering will be given deference and will not be overturned unless it is clearly wrong.See, e.g., Cyphers V. United Parcel Service,
It is my understanding that the argument against this interpretation is that advanced practice nurses are not explicitly exempted from the pharmacy laws restricting the distribution of drugs. The particular language on which this argument is based is apparently the language of A.C.A. §
(a) Nothing in §§
17-92-101 (1)-(11),17-92-102 ,17-92-103 ,17-92-105 ,17-92-205 (b),17-92-206 (b),17-92-303 ,17-92-402 ,17-92-404 ,17-92-405 ,17-92-409 ,17-92-410 , and17-92-411 (a) shall prevent the personal administration of drugs and medicines carried and kept for emergencies by licensed physicians, dentists, or veterinarians in order to supply the immediate needs of their patients while in their presence, nor shall it apply to physicians, dentists, or veterinarians compounding or dispensing their own prescriptions.
A.C.A. §
The above-quoted language gives rise to the question of whether the term "dispensing," as used therein, was intended to include the giving of drug samples to patients. The term "dispensing," as used in this general sense, is not defined in the pharmacy laws or in the Pharmacy Board's general rules and regulations.3
It is my opinion that regardless of whether the term "dispensing," as used in the above-quoted provision, was intended to include the giving of drug samples, this provision does not, simply because it does not mention advanced practice nurses, indicate a legislative intent to exclude advanced practice nurses from the stated exemption. I base this conclusion on the fact that this provision was enacted in 1929 — long before the advent of advanced practice nursing, and certainly before advanced practice nurses were given prescriptive authority or the authority to receive drugs. I note that this provision also does not mention physicians' assistants, who also have prescriptive authority. At the time this provision was enacted, the only medical professionals who had prescriptive authority (and who therefore could be referred to as having "their own prescriptions") were the professionals listed therein. A more likely explanation for the failure of this statute to mention other medical professionals is simply that the statute was never amended to reflect the fact that other medical professionals have, since 1929, been granted prescriptive authority. That fact, coupled with the fact that advanced practice nurses have not only been given prescriptive authority since the enactment of A.C.A. §
It is my opinion that the various medical practitioners' authority to give drug samples to their patients must arise out of the statutes and regulations governing them specifically. See Op. Att'y Gen. No.
My conclusion is bolstered by the fact that federal law, which generally prohibits the distribution of drug samples, see
Assistant Attorney General Suzanne Antley prepared the foregoing opinion, which I hereby approve.
Sincerely,
MARK PRYOR Attorney General
MP:SA/cyh
