History
  • No items yet
midpage
Betancourt v. Logia Suprema, Etc.
1939 Ariz. LEXIS 201
| Ariz. | 1939
|
Check Treatment

Appellants seek a rehearing upon the ground that they are entitled to judgment for the premiums paid, $3.80, if not for the face of the policy. These premiums were not tendered by appellee prior to the filing of suit to recover on the policy and did not when tendered include the costs appellants had incurred up to that time. This being the situation, judgment for $3.80 should have been rendered in favor *Page 264 of appellants, and this would have carried with it their costs in the superior court. The order entered by this court on February 6, 1939, affirming the action of the trial court in directing a verdict for appellee is modified to this extent.

ROSS, C.J., and LOCKWOOD, J., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Betancourt v. Logia Suprema, Etc.
Court Name: Arizona Supreme Court
Date Published: Mar 20, 1939
Citation: 1939 Ariz. LEXIS 201
Docket Number: Civil No. 3984.
Court Abbreviation: Ariz.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.