History
  • No items yet
midpage
Grimes v. State
134 So. 920
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

This court en banc has read and considered the evidence in this case, and has reached the conclusion that such evidence is not sufficient to justify a verdict of guilt. The court erred to a reversal in holding otherwise. Hackworth v. State, 19 Ala. App. 682,96 So. 941; Huckabaa v. State, 23 Ala. App. 333,125 So. 202; McKinnon v. State, 22 Ala. App. 654, 119 So. 596; Clayton v. State, 22 Ala. App. 276, 114 So. 787; Vinson v. State, 22 Ala. App. 112, 113 So. 86; Coggins v. State, 23 Ala. App. 135,122 So. 186.

The judgment of conviction from which this appeal was taken is reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

See, also, 23 Ala. App. 511, 128 So. 120.

Case Details

Case Name: Grimes v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 26, 1931
Citation: 134 So. 920
Docket Number: 4 Div. 771.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.