History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mack v. State
1918 Ala. LEXIS 216
| Ala. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

The appeal in this cause is upon the record proper. There being no bill of exceptions, we cannot review the action of the trial court, therefore, in refusing the written charges requested by the defendant, which are set out in the record. Paitry v. State, 196 Ala. 598, 72 So. 36.

We find no error on the record, and the judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McCLELLAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Mack v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Jan 17, 1918
Citation: 1918 Ala. LEXIS 216
Docket Number: 6 Div. 593.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.