History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowles v. State
25 Ala. App. 605
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law and appeals.

This case was tried by the court without a jury. The evidence was in conflict, and, giving to the court's conclusion the weight to which it is entitled under the law, the judgment must be affirmed. Peterson v. State, 17 Ala. App. 662, 88 So. 49.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Bowles v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 9, 1932
Citation: 25 Ala. App. 605
Docket Number: 8 Div. 478.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.