History
  • No items yet
midpage
Pearson v. Hancock & Son
1918 Ala. LEXIS 57
| Ala. | 1918
|
Check Treatment

If there be any error in the decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the judgment of the lower court, that error is based on a finding of facts. It has been uniformly ruled by this court that we would not review the Court of Appeals as to findings of facts. If the facts as found by the Court of Appeals are as stated in the opinion, then the decision is correct. We find no principle of law decided erroneously.

It results that the application for certiorari must be denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Pearson v. Hancock & Son
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 18, 1918
Citation: 1918 Ala. LEXIS 57
Docket Number: 5 Div. 705.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.