History
  • No items yet
midpage
Browning v. Lockett
1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 155
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

To entitle appellant to the relief he seeks by this motion it must be made to appear that within the time allowed by law he presented to the judge presiding at the trial a bill of exceptions stating the points of decision and the facts which must be truly stated. That means, of course, that the points and facts must be stated as they occurred on the trial in every substantial particular. In this case we find that this has not been done, and section 6435 of the Code of 1923, under which this motion is filed, being highly penal, we must hold the appellant to the letter of the statute. Particular attention is directed to the following authorities; Eason v. State, 22 Ala. App. 424,116 So. 409: Finney v. Sullivan, 22 Ala. App. 130,113 So. 472; Sovereign Camp W. O. W. v. Ward, 200 Ala. 19,75 So. 331; Fries v. Acme W. L. C. Works, 18 Ala. App. 80,89 So. 842.

The motion is overruled.

Case Details

Case Name: Browning v. Lockett
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 17, 1930
Citation: 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 155
Docket Number: 5 Div. 812.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.