History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wells v. State
1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1917
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was indicted for murder and was tried and convicted of manslaughter in the first degree, and from a judgment of conviction he appeals.

The only error complained of is the refusal of the court to continue the case a second time. We have examined the facts as shown by the bill of exceptions, and we are of the opinion that the trial court gave to the defendant every right to which he was entitled, and this case is affirmed on the authority of Brand v. State, 13 Ala. App. 390, 69 So. 379.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Wells v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 10, 1917
Citation: 1917 Ala. App. LEXIS 102
Docket Number: 4 Div. 454.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.