History
  • No items yet
midpage
Eason v. Eason
103 So. 918
| Ala. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The appeal is upon exceptions taken by the ward, appellant, on the final settlement of his guardian, appellee. After deliberate examination of the evidence, we feel convinced that appellant paid fairly his way at least by his labor on appellee's farm, and that appellee's charge of $120 per annum for support should not have been allowed. Further than this we are unwilling to go, in derogation of the conclusions of fact reached in the trial court. No error appears in the other rulings excepted to. The judgment will be reversed, and the cause remanded to the probate court, with direction to enter judgment in accordance with this opinion. Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and MILLER, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Eason v. Eason
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 26, 1925
Citation: 103 So. 918
Docket Number: 7 Div. 527.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.