History
  • No items yet
midpage
Lackey v. State
12 So. 2d 352
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1943
|
Check Treatment

The defendant pleaded guilty to the offense of violating the State prohibition law, and from a judgment and sentence, which he contends was excessive and unwarranted, this appeal was taken. There is no bill of exceptions.

The punishment was within the limits prescribed by the statute and, from aught we can say, it was justified. The judgment, therefore, must be affirmed. Johnson v. State,24 Ala. App. 291, 135 So. 592; Rutland v. State, ante, p. 43,11 So. 2d 768.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Lackey v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 2, 1943
Citation: 12 So. 2d 352
Docket Number: 8 Div. 311.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.