History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. Paramount Coal Co.
104 So. 753
| Ala. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The findings of fact being too meager to fully inform this court in respect to the previous weekly earnings of Tom Williams, the bill of exceptions is considered. Ex parte Mt. Carmel Coal Co., 209 Ala. 519, 96 So. 626. In Woodward Iron Co. v. Bradford, 206 Ala. 447, 90 So. 803, Ex parte H. T. Smith Lumber Co., 206 Ala. 485, 90 So. 807, and Ex parte Sloss-Sheffield S. I. Co. (Greek's Case), 207 Ala. 219,92 So. 458, it was declared of adjudications under the Workmen's Compensation Act (Laws 1919. p. 206) that, where there is "any legal evidence to support the finding, such finding is conclusive, and no technical questions as to the admissibility of evidence will be here considered." At the trial the evidence of the wife and Mr. Donaldson was before the court, and there was evidence on the part of the former to support the judgment rendered.

The costs were awarded within the terms of the statute. Gen. Acts 1919, p. 228.

The writ is denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and BOULDIN, JJ., concur. *Page 282

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. Paramount Coal Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 28, 1925
Citation: 104 So. 753
Docket Number: 6 Div. 336.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.