History
  • No items yet
midpage
Chastain v. State
148 So. 917
Ala. Ct. App.
1933
Check Treatment

The evidence was in conflict. The testimony for the state made a clear case under either count of the indictment. The motion to exclude the evidence was properly overruled.

We have examined the record, and find no reversible error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Chastain v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 18, 1933
Citation: 148 So. 917
Docket Number: 8 Div. 641.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.