History
  • No items yet
midpage
Walsh v. Bank of Moundville
132 So. 51
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

So far as we can see, the identical questions are involved here that were involved in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, 216 Ala. 116, 112 So. 438, and the facts are likewise identical in the two cases. The trial, from the judgment in which this appeal is taken, appears to have been conducted in all respects in accordance with the law as laid down in the opinion in the case of Bank of Moundville v. Carrie K. Walsh, supra. Obviously, there is no alternative for us but to affirm the judgment of the lower court Code 1923, § 7318. And it is affirmed.

Affirmed.






Addendum

Reversed and remanded on authority of Walsh v. Bank of Moundville, 222 Ala. 164, 131 So. 52.

Case Details

Case Name: Walsh v. Bank of Moundville
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 18, 1930
Citation: 132 So. 51
Docket Number: 2 Div. 409.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.