History
  • No items yet
midpage
Harris v. State
25 Ala. App. 636
Ala. Ct. App.
1932
Check Treatment

Defendants were convicted of manufacturing whisky. The sole question presented by this record is the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a conviction. We have read the record and find the evidence sufficient. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Harris v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 19, 1932
Citation: 25 Ala. App. 636
Docket Number: 6 Div. 129, 130.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.