32:T481,{"@context":"https://schema.org","@type":"Legislation","name":"Ex Parte Kemp, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 45","datePublished":"1919-11-20","legislationDate":"1919-11-20","citation":"Ex Parte Kemp, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 45 (Ala. 1919)","countryOfOrigin":"USA","jurisdiction":"Supreme Court of Alabama","description":"Read the full text of Ex Parte Kemp (Ex Parte Kemp, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 45 (Ala. 1919)). This legal opinion, filed in 1919-11-20, from the Supreme Court of Alabama discusses important legal matters. Access this case and related legal documents on Midpage, an AI-powered legal research platform.","mainEntityOfPage":{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/ex-parte-kemp--3241423"},"author":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"Midpage"},"url":"https://app.midpage.ai/document/ex-parte-kemp--3241423","isPartOf":{"@type":"WebSite","name":"Midpage","url":"https://app.midpage.ai"},"inLanguage":"en","keywords":"legal, opinion, document, research, midpage, Ex Parte Kemp, Supreme Court of Alabama, Ex Parte Kemp, 1919 Ala. LEXIS 45 (Ala. 1919)","isAccessibleForFree":true,"isFamilyFriendly":true}34:T4e9, SAYRE, J.

Petitioners were appellants in the Court of Appeals. By that court the judgment of the trial court was reversed and remanded. One of the judges thought the judgment should be rendered. Petitioners now seek to have the cause disposed of in accordance with the minority opinion in the Court of Appeals. The cause was tried by. the court without the intervention of a jury. The Court of Appeals, finding error, was authorized to reverse and remand or render, as it deemed right. Code, § 5361; Munson S. S. Line v. Horace Turner & Co., 81 South. 76. 1 its discretion in that regard depended upon the facts, and this court will not review the Court of Appeals on questions of fact. Postal Tel. & Cable Co. v. Minderhout, 195 Ala. 420, 71 South. 91.

Application denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

202 Ala. 574.