History
  • No items yet
midpage
Richardson v. State
1927 Ala. LEXIS 607
| Ala. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

After affirmance by the Court of Appeals of the judgment of the circuit court, on the authority of Ex parte State ex rel. v. Richardson (Ala.App.) 111 So. 202,1 and In re Richardson v. State (Ala. Sup.) 111 So. 204,2 the appellant, without making application for rehearing in the Court of Appeals, filed the petition for certiorari. This was not a compliance with the rule in such cases, and the motion of the state to dismiss the petition will be granted. Supreme Court rule 44, Code of 1923, p. 894.

Dismissed.

ANDERSON, C. J., and SOMERVILLE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

1 21 Ala. App. 639.

2 Ante, p. 318.

Case Details

Case Name: Richardson v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Mar 24, 1927
Citation: 1927 Ala. LEXIS 607
Docket Number: 1 Div. 447.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.