History
  • No items yet
midpage
Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co.
1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 172
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

This was a suit brought by appellant against appellee claiming damages for the wrongful taking of one Ford automobile. We do not see that any extended discussion of the facts shown by the record is necessary. The trial judge gave the general affirmative charge in favor of appellee, and we think correctly so.

The evidence shows appellee to have held at the time of the alleged wrongful taking a valid written lien upon the car in question; in fact, that the legal title to said car was in it. It fails to show that appellant had become a purchaser without notice of appellee's rights.

The judgment is affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Hinds v. Commercial Credit Co.
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 1, 1927
Citation: 1927 Ala. App. LEXIS 172
Docket Number: 6 Div. 162.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.