History
  • No items yet
midpage
Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
223 Ala. 547
| Ala. | 1931
|
Check Treatment

The action of the plaintiff as to the counts for the destruction by fire of the blueberry bushes and the ruling (and evidence relating thereto) was merely an amendment of the complaint striking out that claim, and was not within the statute for the taking of a nonsuit because of adverse ruling, and the ruling on evidence pertaining thereto is not now for consideration under said statute. *Page 548

The trial proceeded to judgment on the other counts.

The writ is therefore denied.

Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and BOULDIN and BROWN, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Rogers v. Central of Georgia Ry. Co.
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Nov 5, 1931
Citation: 223 Ala. 547
Docket Number: 4 Div. 605.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.