History
  • No items yet
midpage
Wade v. State
17 Ala. App. 371
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

We have examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the state failed to meet the burden of proof necessary to a conviction. The probabilities of innocence are entirely too numerous to permit the conviction to stand. Jeffries v. State, 7 Ala. App. 144, 62 So. 270; McMickens v. State, 16 Ala. App. 78, 75 So. 626.

The defendant was entitled to the general affirmative charge. For the error, the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Wade v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 10, 1920
Citation: 17 Ala. App. 371
Docket Number: 4 Div. 610.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.