History
  • No items yet
midpage
Adams v. State
1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1921
|
Check Treatment

We have carefully examined the evidence in this case, and are of the opinion that the evidence for the state is not sufficient upon which to base a conviction, and that the affirmative charge as requested by the defendant should have been given. Mitchell v. State, ante, p. 119, 89 So. 98.

For this error the judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Adams v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 10, 1921
Citation: 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 117
Docket Number: 8 Div. 795.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.