History
  • No items yet
midpage
Clark v. State
106 So. 872
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

There were two counts in the indictment which the grand jury preferred against this appellant. Count 1, in proper form and substance, charged him with distilling, making, or manufacturing alcoholic, spirituous, malted, or mixed liquors or beverages, a part of which was alcohol, etc. Count 2 charged the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing prohibited liquors or beverages. *Page 208

Demurrers were interposed to count 2, but were overruled, and properly so. This court has many times held that a count of this character was good.

Upon conviction he was sentenced to serve an indeterminate sentence in the penitentiary of from three to four years. Judgment was pronounced and entered accordingly.

Let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed, as there is no error upon the record, and upon the record proper this appeal is predicated. There is no bill of exceptions.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Clark v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 12, 1926
Citation: 106 So. 872
Docket Number: 5 Div. 548.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.