History
  • No items yet
midpage
Taylor v. State
25 Ala. App. 685
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1933
|
Check Treatment

Under the evidence in this case the guilt of the defendant was a question for the jury.

We are moved to say that there are some circumstances connected with this prosecution which tend to show that this charge is the result of malice on the part of some of the witnesses, but, in the absence of error in the trial, we are powerless. The case is one for the pardoning power.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Taylor v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Apr 11, 1933
Citation: 25 Ala. App. 685
Docket Number: 8 Div. 486.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.