History
  • No items yet
midpage
Price v. State
1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1921
|
Check Treatment

The only insistence made by the defendant is that the court should have granted him a new trial on the ground that the verdict was contrary to the evidence. There was sufficient evidence to submit the question of guilt to the jury and to sustain the verdict. The court did not err in overruling the motion.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Price v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 18, 1921
Citation: 1921 Ala. App. LEXIS 8
Docket Number: 3 Div. 365.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.