History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gilbert v. State
1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 243
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

The defendant's special plea was no answer to the indictment, and the court properly sustained demurrers thereto. Wesley Powell v. State (Ala.App.) ante, p. 101, 90 So. 138; Ricketts v. State, ante, p. 162, 90 So. 137.

Each ruling of the court upon the testimony, to which exception was reserved, has been examined, and there appears no error in this connection which could injuriously affect the substantial rights of the defendant. The evidence was in conflict, and was therefore a question for the determination of the jury. The affirmative charge, requested by defendant, was properly refused.

No other question is presented for review. The record proper is free from error, and the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Gilbert v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 20, 1922
Citation: 1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 243
Docket Number: 4 Div. 712.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.