History
  • No items yet
midpage
Williams v. State
85 So. 595
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

The judgment in this case is affirmed on authority of Todd v. State, 13 Ala. App. 301, 69 So. 325; the principle there announced being here reaffirmed, and the reasoning here adopted.

On the evidence, it was a question for the jury to say whether the defendant was sworn as a witness in the Hooten Case. The affirmative charge was properly refused.

There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Williams v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 12, 1920
Citation: 85 So. 595
Docket Number: 6 Div. 668.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.