History
  • No items yet
midpage
McKinney v. State
141 So. 706
| Ala. | 1932
|
Check Treatment

We are persuaded the argument for petitioner overlooks the limited review of this court of decisions of the Court of Appeals as to questions of law therein presented. Baumhauer v. Liquid Carbonic Corp., 223 Ala. 244, 135 So. 427; Hardy v. First National Bank, 219 Ala. 435, 122 So. 702. *Page 8

We find nothing in the opinion in this case calling for the granting of the petition. The writ will be denied.

Writ denied.

BOULDIN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: McKinney v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: May 12, 1932
Citation: 141 So. 706
Docket Number: 6 Div. 148.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.