History
  • No items yet
midpage
Peebles v. State
1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1930
|
Check Treatment

The positive undisputed evidence is to the effect that this defendant did not transport any whisky. A suspicion that he may have had something to do with the transportation is not sufficient to sustain a conviction. The defendant was entitled to the general charge, and in refusing this the court committed reversible error.

The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Peebles v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jun 24, 1930
Citation: 1930 Ala. App. LEXIS 174
Docket Number: 8 Div. 44.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.