History
  • No items yet
midpage
Mims v. State
19 Ala. App. 689
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1922
|
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of manufacturing liquor and he appeals. We have examined each of the exceptions taken to the introduction of evidence, and find no prejudicial error in any of the rulings of the court. There is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed. Affirmed.

MERRITT. J., not sitting.

Case Details

Case Name: Mims v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 19, 1922
Citation: 19 Ala. App. 689
Docket Number: 5 Div. 418.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.