History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cunningham v. State
1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 170
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1940
|
Check Treatment

Appellant's counsel has filed a brief here, in which he argues valiantly that the testimony adduced against this appellant was insufficient to support the verdict of guilt returned against him; also, that some hurtful errors were committed in the admission, over his objection, of certain bits of testimony.

But we do not find any bill of exceptions in the transcript; hence the questions raised, as above indicated, cannot be decided by us.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Cunningham v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Feb 27, 1940
Citation: 1940 Ala. App. LEXIS 170
Docket Number: 7 Div. 525.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.