History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carden v. State
17 Ala. App. 328
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1920
|
Check Treatment

The defendant was indicted under section 7776 of the Code of 1907, was convicted, and sentenced to the penitentiary for a term of years. There is no bill of exceptions in the record, and the trial judge certifies that the time for presenting the bill of exceptions has expired, and that no bill of exceptions has been tendered him. The indictment and judgment appear to be regular, and no errors appear in the record. Motion for new trial and in arrest of judgment appear in the record, but will not be reviewed in the absence of bill of exceptions. Ross v. State, 16 Ala. App. 393, 78 So. 309; Wiggins v. Witherington Co., 96 Ala. 535, 11 So. 539.

A number of refused charges appear in the record but, as the oral charge of the court and no bill of exceptions are incorporated into the record, these charges will not be passed upon by the court. Climer v. St. Clair County Tel. Co.,200 Ala. 656, 77 So. 30; Payne v. State, 10 Ala. App. 85,65 So. 262. The judgment of conviction will be affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Carden v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jan 16, 1920
Citation: 17 Ala. App. 328
Docket Number: 6 Div. 631.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.