History
  • No items yet
midpage
Arrington v. State
1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 270
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1929
|
Check Treatment

We have read this record en banc and fail to find any evidence to justify a conviction. What other influences brought about the verdict of guilt are not disclosed by the record. Be that as it may, the law requires some evidence ofguilt before a conviction will be permitted to stand.

The affirmative charge should have been given for defendant. The defendant's motion for a new trial should have been granted. The judgment is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Arrington v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 17, 1929
Citation: 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 270
Docket Number: 1 Div. 882.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.