History
  • No items yet
midpage
Flournoy v. State
1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 310
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1925
|
Check Treatment

The appellant was convicted of the offense of assault with intent to murder upon one Ike Griffin.

As stated by his counsel in their brief filed on this appeal, there is only one question by exception reserved for our decision.

The witness Henry Stewart was allowed to testify, over defendant's objection, that about one hour before the difficulty, and about one mile away from its scene, he (Stewart) heard defendant say "he was going to shoot the s_____ of a b_____, that he was trying to impose on him," not naming the party later assaulted. This testimony we think admissible under the ruling in Moulton v. State, 19 Ala. App. 446,98 So. 709, and the authorities therein cited.

We find no prejudicial error, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Case Details

Case Name: Flournoy v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Nov 24, 1925
Citation: 1925 Ala. App. LEXIS 310
Docket Number: 4 Div. 168.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.