Lynn v. State
1922 Ala. App. LEXIS 110
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1922

Lead Opinion

*423SAMFORD, J.

[1,2] Since the opinion in the Horn Case, 17 Ala. App. 419, 84 South. 883, the quarantine laws have been changed, and defendant is being prosecuted under section 5 of Acts 1919, p. 29, approved February 7, 1919. The affidavit follows the language of the statute and is sufficient to charge the offense condemned by the statute. Besides, the record fails to show any ruling on the demurrers, and hence we cannot review them here.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

<§=For other cases see same topic and KEY-NUMBER in all Key-Numbered Digests and Indexes



Lead Opinion

Since the opinion in the Horn Case, 17 Ala. App. 419,84 So. 883, the quarantine laws have been changed, and defendant is being prosecuted under section 5 of Acts 1919, p. 29, approved February 7, 1919. The affidavit follows the language of the statute and is sufficient to charge the offense condemned by the statute. Besides, the record fails to show any ruling on the demurrers, and hence we cannot review them here.

We find no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

On Rehearing.
The former opinion is withdrawn; the foregoing opinion substituted. The judgment of reversal is set aside, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.





Rehearing

On Rehearing.

The former opinion is withdrawn; the foregoing opinion substituted. The judgment of reversal is set aside, and the judgment of the lower court is affirmed.