History
  • No items yet
midpage
State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen. v. Daniel
173 So. 915
| Ala. | 1937
|
Check Treatment

Lead Opinion

The majority of the court, consisting of Justices GARDNER, THOMAS, BOULDIN, BROWN, and KNIGHT, find the defendant guilty, and his impeachment is directed. Justice KNIGHT concurs in a special finding, as follows:






Concurrence Opinion

The evidence in this case does not convince me beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant has been guilty of corruption in office, as charged in the information, and he should, in my opinion, be acquitted of that charge.

However, after a most careful consideration of all the evidence, I am at the conclusion that the defendant, during his present term of office, has been guilty of such willful neglect of duty as justifies his removal from office. To this extent I concur in the conclusion of the majority of my associates.

ANDERSON, C. J., and FOSTER, J., dissent.

Case Details

Case Name: State Ex Rel. Atty. Gen. v. Daniel
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Apr 6, 1937
Citation: 173 So. 915
Docket Number: 5 Div. 246.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.