History
  • No items yet
midpage
Kendrick v. State
112 So. 923
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1927
|
Check Treatment

Defendant was convicted of violating the prohibition law. There is not sufficient evidence in this case to support the verdict of the jury. The court should have granted the motion for a new trial. The judgment of conviction must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Kendrick v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: May 24, 1927
Citation: 112 So. 923
Docket Number: 6 Div. 207.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.