History
  • No items yet
midpage
Gandy v. State
198 So. 267
| Ala. | 1940
|
Check Treatment

We have just ruled that § 3258 of the Code 1923 does not apply to review of the Court of Appeals on certiorari, and under the settled practice this court only reviews questions of law presented by the opinion of the Court of Appeals. Henry Walden v. State, 198 So. 261.

The opinion of the Court of Appeals states that the defendant's specially requested charges that were refused are "fairly and substantially covered by the court's oral charge, and by the numerous charges given at request of defendant."

The writ of certiorari is due to be denied, and the judgment of the Court of Appeals affirmed. It is so ordered.

Certiorari denied.

Judgment affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and THOMAS and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Case Details

Case Name: Gandy v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Alabama
Date Published: Oct 17, 1940
Citation: 198 So. 267
Docket Number: 6 Div. 739.
Court Abbreviation: Ala.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.