Sovereign Camp, W. O. W. v. Daniel
228 Ala. 699
| Ala. | 1934|
Check TreatmentThe undisputed facts of this case show that it is controlled by our cases of Higgins v. Sovereign Camp, W. O. W.,
No ruling assigned by appellant was prejudicial when so considered. The judgment is affirmed on the authority of those cases.
Affirmed.
ANDERSON, C. J. and GARDNER and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
