History
  • No items yet
midpage
Ryals v. State
110 So. 925
| Ala. Ct. App. | 1926
|
Check Treatment

The court has read the evidence in this case en banc, and we are of the opinion that the same fails to identify the car found in the possession of the defendants as the car alleged to have been stolen. It follows that the general affirmative charge, requested by appellants, should have been given, and for the error in its refusal the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

Case Details

Case Name: Ryals v. State
Court Name: Alabama Court of Appeals
Date Published: Dec 14, 1926
Citation: 110 So. 925
Docket Number: 4 Div. 198.
Court Abbreviation: Ala. Ct. App.
AI-generated responses must be verified and are not legal advice.
Your Notebook is empty. To add cases, bookmark them from your search, or select Add Cases to extract citations from a PDF or a block of text.